Vegetation Type Information
in KRIS Big River
Timber
Harvest Information in KRIS Big River
KRIS
Web Background Pages: Vegetation Types
The 1994 Landsat imagery,
processed by the U.S. Forest Service Southwest Region Remote Sensing Lab, is
available in the KRIS Big River Map project. Landsat imagery for most other
areas of the State is also available (Warbington et al., 1998; Schwind, 1999).
These data allow a quick review of seral stages in various Calwater planning
units. The USFS classification system, which uses ten size classes, but not
tree type, was chosen. Tree size was then used as a surrogate for seral
stage. Timber harvest data from the California Department of Forestry CDF is
also incorporated into KRIS Big River Maps. These can be used in conjunction
with the USFS vegetation classification to explore watershed disturbance.
Watersheds with lower disturbance
levels are more likely to have a diverse assemblage of salmonid species (Reeves
et al., 1993). Reeves et al. (1993) found that in Oregon coastal watersheds
where timber harvest exceeded 25%, streams had lost salmonid species diversity
and tended to be dominated by one salmonid species. The Non-Forest, Sapling
(1-4.9") and Small Tree (5-12") components often represent logging. If these
components comprise more than 30% of the vegetation and timber types, then cumulative
effects risks in a watershed should be considered during watershed assessment.
The Fire and Resource Assessment
Program (FRAP) of CDF has recently completed a project that shows the changes
in the landscape between 1994 and 1998, based on Landsat data (Fisher,
2001). This process, called change scene detection, is very useful in KRIS Map
projects because it helps update vegetation coverages that were based on 1994
imagery.
|
This image, from the
KRIS Big River Map project, shows USFS vegetation coverage derived from
1994 Landsat imagery for the entire Big River Basin. Large Non-Forest components
in the east and west are natural due to grasslands on interior Central Belt
mélange terrain and on the marine terraces along the coast. The northern
part of the watershed, mostly in Jackson Demonstration State Forest, has
substantial components of Small-Medium (12-19.9") and Medium/Large
trees (20-29.9") interspersed with small patches of Large Trees (30-39.9").
This indicates a more mature forest than in the South Fork, Lower Big River,
Daugherty Creek and the upper North Fork, which are industrial timber lands.(81
KB) |
|
The image
at left shows Big River KRIS subbasins and change scene detection between
1994 and 1998 Landsat images provided by the California Department of Forestry,
Fire and Resource Assessment Program, Sacramento. The Big River basin showed
the greatest vegetation reduction (orange and reds) in the Lower and Upper
Big River basins. The North Fork Caspar Creek showed canopy increase (green/light
green) as forests grew. Loss of canopy in the Coastal Tributary basin is
driven by residential development, as opposed to forestry. (55 KB) |
|
This bar
chart from the KRIS Big River database shows vegetation and timber types
in the Chamberlain Creek Calwater planning watershed, in the North Fork
Big River basin. The information was derived from a 1994 Landsat image by
the U.S. Forest Service. This area had a large component of medium-large
trees (20"-29.9") as of 1994, which comprised 51% of the watershed. Large
trees (30-40") comprised 2% of the watershed while small to medium-sized
trees (12-19.9" diameter) made up 20% of the watershed. Small trees (5-11.9"
diameter) made up 22% of the watershed and saplings (1-4.9" diameter) only
5%. There was no Non-Forest component. (15 KB) |
|
This image,
from the KRIS Big River Map, project shows USFS vegetation and stand types
for the Chamberlain Creek (NF Big River) Calwater planning watershed, derived
from a 1994 Landsat. (361 KB) |
|
The bar
chart at left shows vegetation and timber types of the South Daugherty Creek
Calwater planning watershed, which is the same as the Daugherty Creek watershed
proper. The area had a large component, 35%, of medium-large trees
(20"-29.9") as of 1994, and medium sized trees (12-19.9" diameter) made
up 11% of the watershed. The large combined components of small trees, 14%
(5-11.9" diameter), 30% saplings (1-4.9" diameter) and 9% non-forest, indicate
a rapid rate of recent timber harvest. With a disturbance covering 50% of
the watershed in less than a 15 year period, cumulative watershed effects
risk are likely to be elevated. (16 KB) |
|
This image,
from the KRIS Big River Map project, shows USFS vegetation and stand types
for the Daugherty Creek watershed, derived from a 1994 Landsat. Non-Forest
and Saplings in this basin are mostly associated with recent timber harvest.
The scale of accuracy for stands is one hectare. An exception is in the
eastern part of the watershed, where Central Belt Franciscan bed rock gives
rise to natural grasslands.(66 KB) |
|
The image
above comes from the KRIS Big River Map project and shows timber harvests
as mapped by the California Department of Forestry by year from 1986 to
1999. The extensive logged areas correlate to the high amount of early seral
stage vegetation in the South Daugherty Creek Calwater. (145 KB) |
References
Reeves,
G.H., F.H. Everest and J.R. Sedell. 1993 . Diversity of Juvenile Anadromous
Salmonid Assemblages in Coastal Oregon Basins with Different Levels of Timber
Harvest. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. Vol 122, No. 3. May
1993.
Schwind,
B. 1999. USFS Thematic Mapper Landsat Vegetation Coverage Background Information.
USDA Forest Service. Pacific Southwest Region Remote Sensing Lab. Sacramento,
CA.
Warbington,
R., B. Schwind, C. Curlis and S. Daniel. 1998. Creating a Consistent and
Standardized Vegetation Database for Northwest Forest Plan Monitoring in California.
USDA Forest Service. Pacific Southwest Region Remote Sensing Lab. Sacramento,
CA.